"Duel" Diligence: Second Thoughts about the Supremes as the Sultans of Swing
We respond to Professor Lynn A. Baker's criticisms of our article, The Most Dangerous Justice: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Mathematics. Professor Baker fundamentally misunderstands our measure of Supreme Court voting power. Moreover, she erroneously presumes that the "median Justice" wields the bulk of the Court's power. Even if there were a median Justice, it is far from clear whether he would be the Most Dangerous Justice. We conclude with a clarification of the median voter theorem and its implications for the distribution of voting power within the Supreme Court.
Paul H. Edelman & Jim Chen, "Duel" Diligence: Second Thoughts about the Supremes as the Sultans of Swing, 70 S. Cal. L. Rev. 219 (1996).
This document is currently not available here.